Gas is the fee required to perform transactions and any other actions on the Ethereum network. Each type of transaction consumes a different amount of gas and is calculated depending on the complexity. Simple ETH transfers cost less gas than transferring ERC tokens or swapping assets at a decentralized exchange (DEX) on Ethereum.
Each block in the network has its own gas limit. If the gas limit is exceeded, the block will become invalid. Block gas limits can change over time, depending on many factors. Therefore, transactions do not always end up in the same block at all times.
Miners who verify transactions prioritize the transactions with the highest gas fees. The gas fee acts as a contractor for the block space. When a larger number of users jointly bid on a smaller block, this move can lead to high network fees.
The important aspect to remember is that gas fees are independent of transaction size. They depend on the number of transactions being performed on the Ethereum network at the same time.
For example, if a transaction is processed during busy times, users may have to pay hundreds of dollars just to make the transaction. This is one of the dilemmas of the Ethereum PoW network. Currently, the network can only handle about 30 transactions per second.
During peak hours, users will have to pay higher gas fees to ensure their transactions are processed. If the user does not pay the full gas fee, the transaction fails but the gas fee is still charged.
The situation of the Ethereum network being overloaded with transactions is not uncommon, pushing fees to sky-high levels. One of the first examples of how the Ethereum network could become congested was during the 2017 CryptoKitties craze.
The massive NFT boom in 2021 also brought a lot of new users to Ethereum, causing gas fees to skyrocket. This also happens during the launch of projects, such as the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) by Yuga Labs.
The Ethereum Foundation plans to move to PoS by the end of 2022 and is called Ethereum 2.0. The new version will improve the scalability of the network and reduce gas fees. While the community is still eagerly awaiting this repeatedly delayed update, there are many other measures proposed to reduce fees and EIP-4488 is one of them.
EIP-4488 is an Ethereum Improvement Proposal called “Reducing calldata transaction gas fees with a total calldata limit” introduced by Vitalik Buterin and Ansgar Dietrichs in November 2021. The proposal focuses on reducing transaction costs for Ethereum rollup solutions such as Optimism, Arbitrum, and zkSync.
In this proposal, Buterin and Dietrichs outlined steps to reduce gas without compromising security and a roadmap toward the development of Ethereum 2.0.
The main ideas presented in the proposal EIP-4488:
It is important to keep the block size small so that it is decentralized and anyone can run a node. Currently, Ethereum block sizes are manageable and any upgrade such as EIP-4488 will not increase maintenance costs.
Note that the proposed EIP-4488 does not directly reduce layer 1 data. However, it does support rollup, which helps to balance implementation costs while maintaining the same maximum capacity.
Data availability is another serious scaling issue for the Ethereum network. But EIP-4488 solves this problem because it relieves layer 2 protocols.
EIP-4488 is the predecessor of EIP-4844 and takes a simpler approach to solving the problem of high transaction fees. EIP-4488 introduces two important aspects:
– Gas calldata cost reduced from 16 to 3 gas per byte.
– 1 MB per block and 300 bytes per transaction (up to 1.4 MB) to minimize security risks.
EIP-4488 mainly focuses on calldata – read-only byte location space where the data parameter of a transaction or instruction is stored.
In other words, EIP-4488 will limit the total number of transactional calldata, where data from external commands to functions is stored, before reducing the cost of gas calldata to eliminate the possibility of network stagnation.
A hard limit is the easiest way to ensure an increase in caseload (workload) doesn’t lead to a worst-case load increase. Rollup costs will increase dramatically, increasing the average block size to hundreds of kilobytes. However, the hard limit prevents the worst-case scenario of single blocks containing 10 MB. The block size in the worst case will actually be smaller than it is now (1.4 MB vs 1.8 MB).
It is important to note that node operators will face increased workloads simply due to increased data capacity. A blockchain’s entire database would be too much of a burden for most computers to store. However, this problem can be solved with another additional proposal to reduce the block storage responsibility for nodes longer than a year.
Proposal EIP-4488 will affect users directly, as it reduces rollup costs and reduces layer 2 gas charges.
EIP-4488 is a short-term solution to Ethereum’s high gas fees. Users of layer 2 solutions like Optimism and Arbitrum will see a 3–8x reduction in transaction fees. Users of zk-rollups can pay gas fees up to 40–100 times cheaper than Ethereum’s base layer.
However, some developers expressed concern about the growing transaction data. The EIP-4488 upgrade implies that the overall block size will increase, which is a problem in the long term. If this upgrade is implemented, the size of the Ethereum blockchain will increase at a rate of 0.1 MB to 0.5 MB per block, 5 times the rate of chain growth. This can cause problems for users who want to become nodes, as they will need better hardware.
Another concern is that upgrading to the EIP-4488 may cause other network limitations. Users need to pay more fees than high-paying rollup transactions competing for the same calldata space.
Proposal EIP-4488 was created to reduce transaction costs for rollup protocols built on the Ethereum blockchain. EIP-4488 is an intermediate proposal while the network is waiting for a sharding solution to be introduced via EIP-4844.
However, the main update that everyone is waiting for and is expected to address Ethereum’s scaling problem is the switch from PoW to PoS consensus. This update will almost certainly put an end to gas charge issues, so users won’t have to wait too long before they get what they want either way.
DISCLAIMER: The Information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Join CoinCu Telegram to keep track of news: https://t.me/coincunews
Follow CoinCu Youtube Channel | Follow CoinCu Facebook page
Harold
CoinCu News
Clanker token trading volume hit $59.8M on Nov 21, accounting for 14.75% of PumpFun. Fee…
Bitcoin Spot ETF inflows hit $1.005B on Nov 21, led by BlackRock’s $608M and Fidelity’s…
Discover the success story of a New York tech entrepreneur who made $72M from a…
Discover the best cryptos to buy and hold today: Qubetics leads with 1000x potential, Ethereum…
With the platform facing a cracked whip, Trump Media company is expanding into new business…
Major crypto firms, including Ripple, Kraken, and Circle, are competing for spots on President-elect Donald…
This website uses cookies.