News

El Dorado Founder: Bomb Contract Deployment Is To Protect ELP-1 Users

Key Points:

  • The founder of El Dorado Exchange stated in response to yesterday’s incident, saying that the project is responding to the ELP-3 exploit incident that occurred last week.
  • The purpose of this action is to protect ELP-1 users from potential attackers.
  • He stated that their poor decision-making led to yesterday’s new attack.
After yesterday’s noisy incident, the head of El Dorado Exchange finally responded to answer questions from the community.

In reaction to yesterday’s occurrence, Dorado, the creator of Perpetual DEX El Dorado Exchange (EDE), published a statement claiming that the project is reacting to the ELP-3 exploit, a situation that happened last week (and paid a fee of $90,000).

Around this time, the project swiftly launched a contract dubbed the “bomb contract” to quickly liquidate whitelisted traders who targeted the platform in order to prevent bad traders who had previously assaulted the platform from starting another attack.

This fostered paranoia among the team members to keep an eye out for someone exploiting or trying to see whether an exploit was conceivable, which resulted in a self-fulfilling prophecy.

The only purpose of this contract is to catch a particular whitelisted address that it believes is assaulting ELP-1. This contract’s objective is to protect ELP-1 users from prospective attackers and to penalize them.

Dorado indicated that yesterday’s latest assault was the result of bad decision-making and that they will devise a mechanism to recompense the affected consumers. Dorado said that an attacker should not be compelled to do anything, regardless of their moral opinion. Dorado further stated that yesterday’s assailant demanded a processing fee of 10% of the stolen monies while returning the funds.

As Coincu reported, El Dorado Exchange suffered a $580,000 loss as a result of the assault. An address has been transferring modest sums of money to Arbitrum’s ELP-1 pool. And then promptly remove significant quantities of money.

According to the attacker, the protocol backdoor enables the developer to forcibly liquidate any position. If the developer confesses to pricing manipulation, the fund will be reimbursed. The attacker had returned 334,000 USDC, according to PeckShieldAlert.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.

Join us to keep track of news: https://linktr.ee/coincu

Harold

Coincu News

Harold

With a passion for untangling the complexities of the financial world, I've spent over four years in financial journalism, covering everything from traditional equities to the cutting edge of venture capital. "The financial markets are a fascinating puzzle," I often say, "and I love helping people make sense of them." That's what drives me to bring clear and insightful financial journalism to the readers of Coincu.

Recent Posts

Sui Token Supply Is Controversial When Over 84% Of Staked Tokens Are Controlled By Founders

Over 84% of the staked Sui token supply is controlled by the founders, raising centralization…

4 hours ago

New Coinbase Class Action Lawsuit Is Attacking Exchange With Securities Listing Charges

The Coinbase class action lawsuit, echoing a previous case against the exchange, accuses it of…

4 hours ago

Bitfinex Data Breach Is Now Causing Controversy, Tether CEO Voices Rebuttal

Tether's CEO, Paolo Ardoino, highlights discrepancies in the Bitfinex data breach, revealing that only a…

4 hours ago

FSOCIETY Threatens Massive Bitfinex Data Leak: 400,000 Users At Risk

Bitfinex data leak allegedly by FSOCIETY includes 2.5TB of exchange data and 400K users' details.…

17 hours ago

Disappointment Clouds Friend Tech v2 Launch Despite Exciting New Features

According to Parsec, Friend Tech v2's launch disappointed many, with 95% users unable to claim…

18 hours ago

Ethereum Classification Supported By Ripple CEO In Battle With SEC

The legal debate over Ethereum classification intensifies as Consensys sues SEC for regulatory overreach.

1 day ago

This website uses cookies.