Key Points:
The DOJ’s attorneys have cited the need to sift through a massive trove of corporate records and communications from Celsius, which includes over 1,200 videos of “ask-me-anything” sessions featuring Mashinsky and other executives, some lasting over an hour.
Mashinsky, who was taken into custody earlier this month, has entered a plea of not guilty to charges of securities fraud, commodities fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy to manipulate the price of CEL, Celsius’ native token. His defense in court is led by lawyer Marc Mukasey.
Judge John G. Koeltl of the District Court for the Southern District of New York has set the next conference date for October 3rd, with the trial date yet to be determined. Koeltl had previously granted Mashinsky’s team additional time to comply with the conditions of his $40 million bail.
This recent arrest follows Mashinsky’s previous detention on July 13 on federal securities fraud charges, coinciding with the crypto exchange’s agreement to settle a $4.7 billion lawsuit with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
Celsius, along with Mashinsky, is also facing lawsuits from both the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on allegations of conspiring to defraud investors of substantial amounts.
Mashinsky faces a string of charges in Manhattan federal court, encompassing securities, commodities, and wire fraud, as well as various securities manipulation and fraud charges. If convicted, both Mashinsky and his co-defendant, Roni Cohen-Pavon, could be sentenced to decades in prison.
Celsius’ settlement with the FTC stands as one of the largest in the agency’s history, comparable to the record $5 billion fine imposed on Meta in 2019. This settlement comes as the FTC accuses Celsius and Mashinsky of engaging in repeated deceptive practices.
The terms of the settlement, announced by the FTC, dictate that the payment will be withheld until Celsius can return the remaining customer assets amidst ongoing bankruptcy proceedings.
In the charging document, the office of U.S. Attorney Damian Williams alleges that:
“Mashinsky misrepresented, among other things, the safety of Celsius’s yield-generating activities, Celsius’s profitability, the long-term sustainability of Celsius’ high rewards rates, and the risks associated with depositing crypto assets with Celsius.”
As the trial date looms, the outcome of this high-profile case could have significant implications for the crypto industry and its regulatory landscape. The court proceedings will undoubtedly be closely monitored by stakeholders and investors alike.
DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
London, UK, May 10th, 2024, ChainwireKintsu, a leading innovator in the DeFi space, is thrilled…
KuCoin resumes operations in India after paying a $41,000 penalty, while Binance registration in India…
Telegram trading bots represent a growing trend in cryptocurrency trading, offering both publicly and privately…
Notable contenders leading the charge in Ethereum ETF applications include VanEck, BlackRock, and ARK Invest,…
Nyan Heroes Airdrop has become a trending topic, hailed as the hottest AAA shooter game…
Slow Mist founder exposes TON phishing messages, which users tricked into believing they receive cheap…
This website uses cookies.