Do you want to improve the blockchain infrastructure? Working on second layer solutions

There has been a lot of discussion about how blockchain opens up endless business opportunities. And while all of these rumors haven’t quite translated into tangible results, the boom in decentralized finance and non-distributed tokens (NFTs) has paved the way for the achievable and how blockchain can really affect even the most conservative industries. 

In contrast to two to four years ago, developers, entrepreneurs and companies are not just blindly joining in. It’s no longer about what blockchain can do. The question now arises as to how best to use technology for the best results. As a result, blockchain has slowly evolved from a buzzword to an applicable mainstream technology. If this doesn’t indicate real growth and development, what then?

Related: Blockchain technology can change the world and not just through cryptocurrencies

However, this does not mean that things have gone smoothly so far. Ever since we started looking at blockchain as a viable technology for mainstream applications, the throughput performance of blockchains, especially blockchains that are already widely used, has been closely monitored. Understandably, scalability is still a metric to measure the readiness of blockchain networks to take over enterprise applications.

Using Ethereum as a case study, it can be said that many Ethereum users have directly addressed the disadvantages of a non-distributed blockchain infrastructure. In my experience, high transaction fees due to network congestion are a potential deal breaker for retail investors. There is no way for the average user to justify paying a $ 70 fee for a transaction that might not even be worth $ 100.

In particular, Ethereum’s inability to scale accordingly has to some extent hampered the establishment of DeFi and NFT sectors, with retail investors and traders keen to do so. Even Vitalik Buterin recently acknowledged the gravity of the situation, stating that the current scale and fee system is unsustainable if the goal is for social networking projects run by NFTs to thrive on the Ethereum network.

So the question is: how did blockchain developers respond to this repetitive problem?

Is First Grade Ever Enough?

I believe the ultimate goal is to solve the blockchain dilemma, which is to strike a balance between decentralization, security and scalability. In most cases, blockchains have to do without one of these three functions. In most legacy blockchains, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, infrastructure design sacrifices scalability for security and decentralization.

It has to be said that Bitcoin and Ethereum are the two most popular blockchains, not only because they are the first of their kind, but also because they established themselves as the most secure and decentralized blockchain network on the market. What they lack in scalability, they essentially make up for in other core blockchain requirements. While this was sufficient in the early years of operation, the influx of blockchain applications has certainly put a lot of pressure on Layer 1 chains to develop and integrate infrastructures geared towards scalability.

Related: Where does DeFi’s future belong: Ethereum or Bitcoin? Experts answer

While newer blockchains are much easier to manage by implementing scalable infrastructure from the ground up, it is much more difficult for those with existing infrastructure. As seen in the case of Ethereum, this could require a complete overhaul of the existing infrastructure. Moving an existing multi-billion dollar blockchain economy to a new blockchain infrastructure carries many risks. A lot can go wrong, especially since it has never been seen on such a scale before.

Therefore, it is usually obvious for DApp developers and users to opt for scalable, centralized Layer 1 chains. As expected, the list of Layer 1 chain solutions trying to capitalize on the boom in demand for fast blockchain infrastructure has grown over the years – notable mentions include Binance Smart Chain, Tron, and EOS. However, as we have found, decentralization does not appear to be the strongest of these options. Given the blockchain dilemma mentioned earlier, most of the alternatives to Ethereum and Bitcoin were resolved for the speed of decentralization. So it becomes a question of the developers’ preferences and willingness to compromise.

Perhaps a third and more advantageous option is to use Layer 2 solutions. With this, developers can at least be sure that they have access to all the little things that are required to create optimal blockchain applications.

Andrey Sergeenkov is an independent researcher, analyst and author in the crypto space. As a staunch advocate of blockchain technology and a decentralized world, he believes the world yearns for such decentralization in government, society, and business. He is the founder of BTC Peers, an independent media company.