NFTs News

US SEC Commissioner Opposes First SEC Sanctions Action Against NFT

Key Points:

  • US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) commissioners Hester Peirce and Mark Uyeda opposed the Commission’s enforcement actions against the NFT.
  • Part of the reason is that they disagree with the rules for applying the Howey test.
  • The SEC is long overdue to address these issues and provide guidance as the NFT evolves.
US Securities and Exchange Commission commissioners Hester Peirce and Mark Uyeda objected to the Commission’s enforcement actions to treat the sale of NFTs as securities. They said, in part, they disagreed with the Howey test rules. The SEC did not have sufficient grounds to bring this matter into its jurisdiction.

Certain statements by the company and the buyer cited in the non-promising order constitute an investment contract. Even if NFT sales fully complied with Howey’s regulations, more than a series of events would be required to warrant enforcement action.

According to the trustees, as the first NFT settlement, this enforcement action raises many conundrums. The Commission should have addressed these questions long ago and provided guidance when the NFT began spreading. The SEC is long overdue to address these issues and provide advice as the NFT evolves. Discussing the NFT can now help the Commission handle the matter wisely.

Hester Peirce said that the NFT is not an asset class with a single use case and that different NFTs have many use cases, so the Commission may need a new category to determine how the law should be applied to securities for incentives and sales.

As previously reported, the SEC has accused Los Angeles entertainment company Impact Theory of issuing NFTs without registration, which is also the regulator’s first enforcement action against the NFT.

The Commission’s enforcement underscores the need for compliance and transparency in the evolving landscape of crypto assets and NFTs. It is one of the rare times the agency has noticed “interest” in this area.

In response to the allegations, Impact Theory agreed to a settlement with them paying fines of more than $6.1 million. In addition, the company will return the investment amount to the stakeholders and guarantee the destruction of the NFTs associated with the offering.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.

Andy

Share
Published by
Andy

Recent Posts

Ethereum ETF Issuers Enter Race For Sponsor Fees With Franklin ETF Charges 0.19%

Despite regulatory hurdles and amendments by Ethereum ETF issuers, industry experts predict a June-end launch…

4 hours ago

No New Matter Labs Trademark Applications Will Be Filed For ZK As Controversies Grow

Polygon Labs calls for legal cost coverage, opposing Matter Labs trademark application claims alongside other…

5 hours ago

Congress’s Crypto Custody Bill Vetoed by President Biden, SAB 121 Resolutely Protected

President Biden vetoed Congress's crypto custody bill to repeal SEC's crypto guidance, SAB 121.

6 hours ago

21Shares Core Ethereum ETF Now Operates Independently as Ark Invest Withdraws

Ark Investment Management has withdrawn from launching a spot-Ether ETF in partnership with 21Shares, with…

6 hours ago

Crypto Prediction 2024: Will ETFSwap (ETFS) Outperform Internet Computer (ICP) And Tron (TRX)?

ETFSwap (ETFS) is expected to outperform Internet Computer (ICP) and Tron (TRX) in 2024 in…

6 hours ago

Bybit’s VATP Application License in HK Is Now Withdrawn With Legal Challenges

Bybit's VATP application license in Hong Kong was withdrawn on May 31 following SFC scrutiny.

6 hours ago

This website uses cookies.