Ripple Labs debuted in the fintech industry in 2012, promising financial institutions a cost-effective and efficient solution for cross-border money transfers. To fulfill this promise, the company developed the RippleNet network, which enables real-time settlement and clearance of transactions using a cryptocurrency called XRP.
Over time, XRP expanded beyond its initial intended use. In 2013, the company’s founders utilized XRP to raise funds, and between 2013 and 2020, Ripple Labs sold XRP tokens to raise a capital of USD 1.3 billion.
The lawsuit, filed on December 22, 2020, asserts that Ripple raised over $1.3 billion through unlawful methods. The SEC complaint also holds Ripple co-founder Christian Larsen and current CEO Bradley Garlinghouse accountable, claiming that they profited significantly from these activities.
For investors, this case could mean greater regulatory scrutiny and potential changes in the way they invest in digital assets. Blockchain innovators may face heightened regulatory challenges, impacting the development and launch of new cryptocurrencies and blockchain projects.
Furthermore, lawmakers worldwide will be closely watching this case, as it could influence their decisions on how to regulate the ever-evolving crypto landscape.
When the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Ripple Labs in late 2020, it surprised many. Ripple was already trading on over 200 exchanges, not indicating that it was under the scrutiny of the SEC.
The SEC’s lawsuit alleged that Ripple’s co-founders, Chris Larsen and Brad Garlinghouse, illegally raised capital by offering XRP tokens to global investors without registering them as securities. Furthermore, the SEC claimed that Ripple Labs used XRP for non-cash transactions to promote their token sales.
According to the complaint, in addition to structuring and promoting the XRP sales used to finance the company’s business, Larsen and Garlinghouse also effected personal unregistered sales of XRP totaling approximately $600 million.
SEC wrote in the document
As XRP tokens were integral to funding Ripple’s platform, which facilitates money transfers for retailers, a civil action was initiated in December 2020. Notably, the sales of XRP also resulted in significant enrichment for the management of the platform.
Ripple Labs has responded to the SEC’s allegations in a 93-page document. Ripple cited four key counters to the SEC’s claims in their response.
Ripple has also referred to potential connections between SEC members and other cryptocurrency platforms, including Ethereum. Although there is no concrete evidence of these connections, the commission granted Ethereum an exemption from securities regulations, citing its decentralized operation.
On July 13, 2023, a significant court ruling declared that XRP, the digital asset associated with Ripple, is not classified as a security. This decision came in response to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) attempt to halt the offering of XRP tokens. The court granted summary judgment in favor of Ripple Labs, affirming that XRP does not meet the criteria to be considered a security.
The impact of this ruling is significant, as it extends beyond the public sale of XRP on exchanges to include institutional sales by Ripple. Following the court’s decision, XRP experienced a remarkable surge, with its value increasing by more than 30% and reaching its highest level in over a year. The token was trading at $0.61.
According to the Howey Test and the ruling in SEC v. Ripple, XRP and other cryptocurrencies are considered securities when they are offered to institutional investors. However, when these cryptocurrencies are sold on exchanges to retail investors, they do not fall under the securities classification.
The Howey Test is a legal concept that originated from the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case (SEC v. Howey) which established criteria for determining whether a transaction qualifies as an “investment contract.”
If the transaction meets these criteria, it is classified as a security under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. An investment contract exists when there is an investment of money in a collective venture with a reasonable expectation of earning profits from the efforts of others.
The series of events during the SEC Vs. Ripple updates are outlined below:
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Ripple Labs, Brad Garlinghouse (the CEO), and Chris Larsen (the co-founder), alleging that they conducted an unregistered securities offering. In response to the SEC’s allegations, Garlinghouse stated that Ripple will defend itself in the legal proceedings.
Coinbase made the decision to remove the XRP token from its platform. This move is likely influenced by the ongoing legal dispute and regulatory uncertainty surrounding the classification of XRP.
Larsen and Garlinghouse presented letters to the court asserting that the SEC did not have adequate advance notice about the categorization of XRP as a security. They expressed concerns about the SEC’s purported failure to offer explicit guidance to participants in the market.
The SEC has requested an immediate hearing to address the fair notice issue and other case-related matters raised by Larsen and Garlinghouse.
Judge Sarah Netburn ruled that XRP possesses both currency value and utility, distinguishing it from cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether. This ruling represents a significant milestone in the case and highlights the differentiation between various digital assets.
SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce published the Token Safe Harbor Proposal 2.0. This proposal aims to provide developers with a three-year grace period, exempting them from securities laws, to gain a deeper understanding of their involvement in decentralized networks.
The court extended the SEC’s deadline for disclosing its internal crypto trading policies to August 31, 2021. This extension allows more time for the SEC to reveal its internal workings regarding cryptocurrency trading and potential conflicts of interest.
As per the extended deadline, the SEC was required to disclose its internal crypto trading policies. This disclosure aims to provide transparency regarding the SEC’s operations and their potential impact on the case.
Judge Netburn has granted the SEC until February 17 to appeal her previous decision that required Ripple Labs to disclose certain sensitive government documents.
Ripple has filed two petitions in a row to abolish the role of the US regulator. On Feb. 23, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed its controversial response to Ripple Inc.’s Feb. 10 response. about Fair Notice safeguards.
Both the SEC and Ripple Labs have submitted their initial motions for summary judgment, marking a significant step in the legal proceedings. These motions outline each party’s arguments and positions regarding the case.
The court has reviewed and granted a request from the Chamber of Digital Commerce, an American advocacy group for blockchain technology, to file an amicus curiae brief.
After the November 30 deadline, the SEC and Ripple Labs’ replies supporting their summary judgment motions have been made public. These documents provide additional insights into the parties’ legal arguments and responses to the opposing party’s motion.
The SEC has applied to prevent the release of the Hinman documents in the XRP lawsuit, including any references to them in court papers submitted by Ripple Labs. The relevance and potential impact of the Hinman documents have been subject to a lengthy debate between Ripple and the SEC.
After an extended legal process, the Hinman documents have finally been unsealed and made publicly available. These documents, which include the internal communications of William Hinman, the former director of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance, hold potential significance in the Ripple vs. SEC lawsuit.
Judge Torres ruled that Ripple did not violate the law when XRP was sold on public exchanges, marking a success for the cryptocurrency sector in its legal battles with U.S. regulators.
However, the decision was not entirely in favor of the industry, as Ripple was found to have violated securities laws when offering XRP to hedge funds and other institutional buyers.
In conclusion, the SEC lawsuit against Ripple has been a landmark case in the cryptocurrency industry. It began with allegations that Ripple Labs raised over $1.3 billion through unlawful methods, and it led to a significant legal battle that lasted for nearly three years.
Ripple, its co-founders, and the SEC presented their respective arguments, leading to various developments in the case. Notably, on July 13, 2023, a crucial court ruling declared that XRP is not classified as a security, bringing relief to Ripple and the broader crypto community. However, it’s important to note that Ripple was found to have violated securities laws when offering XRP to institutional buyers.
This case has raised important questions about the regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies and how they are classified under securities laws. It has also highlighted the need for clear guidance from regulatory authorities in a rapidly evolving industry.
Ultimately, the Ripple vs. SEC lawsuit serves as a pivotal moment in the ongoing dialogue about the regulation of digital assets, and it will likely continue to influence the development and oversight of cryptocurrencies in the years to come.
DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Discover why Qubetics, Cosmos, and Chainlink are the best cryptos to buy in November 2024.…
Best Cryptos to Buy in December 2024: Qubetics ($TICS) presale explodes, Ethereum (ETH) eyes a…
Palo Alto, California, 21st November 2024, Chainwire
Best Cryptos to Buy: Qubetics presale rockets ahead, Bitcoin nears $100k, and Avalanche prepares to…
London, United Kingdom, 21st November 2024, Chainwire
The move will see developers utilize USDC on Aptos in creating dApps on a wide…
This website uses cookies.
