However, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has imposed Bitcoin ETF requirements, which can be said to be a turning point, insisting on cash transactions instead of the standard in-kind redemptions using Bitcoin, potentially increasing costs for retail investors.
According to Fortune, this departure from the Bitcoin ETF requirements is raising eyebrows, considering that in-kind transactions are the standard practice for other ETFs.
The SEC’s decision to bar ETF issues from utilizing Bitcoin for in-kind redemptions, opting for cash transactions instead, diverges from its approval of a gold ETF in 2014, where in-kind transactions involving physical gold bars were considered more efficient.
The SEC‘s rationale behind this stance appears to be unusually rooted in viewing Bitcoin as a novel and potentially manipulable asset. The agency aims to minimize opportunities for self-dealing by market makers and ETF issuers. However, the likelihood of such manipulation remains uncertain, especially considering that a federal appeals court previously rejected this argument, prompting the SEC to lift its block on Bitcoin ETFs.
In a related development, Coinbase, a leading cryptocurrency exchange, plans to appeal the SEC’s rejection of its proposal for a new digital asset framework.
DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Wormhole will soon launch Worldcoin World ID on the Solana blockchain, enhancing cross-chain interoperability.
The Tezos X upgrade, set for 2026, will consolidate transaction execution into a single rollup,…
SEC approvals for Bitcoin and expected Ether ETFs have driven proposed VanEck spot Solana ETF.
Coinbase legal action follows its denied FOIA requests for information on SEC investigations and FDIC…
Mpeppe (MPEPE) has emerged as a significant player in the cryptocurrency market, particularly in the…
This website uses cookies.