The Australian Securities and Investments Commission is pursuing action against financial influencers who they believe are misleading the general public about cryptocurrency.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has issued new cautions about appropriate conduct for financial influencers, which could have a significant impact on the local crypto business.
ASIC’s latest Information Sheet details the pitfalls that influencers and the organizations that hire them may fall into while advertising financial products, whether intentionally or unintentionally. Failure to heed ASIC’s warnings could result in fines of millions of dollars for businesses and up to five years in prison for individuals.
Gow’s assessment is based on the somewhat nebulous distinction ASIC has made between objective facts about a financial product and the way in which influencers may present them. It states:
“If you present factual information in a way that conveys a recommendation that someone should (or should not) invest in that product or class of products, you could breach the law by providing unlicensed financial product advice.”
He believes that under current laws, the crypto industry should be exempted from these new restrictions. He told:
“ASIC’s current policy applies the law to crypto to the extent that digital assets fall within the definition of a financial product. Crypto is currently unregulated and not a financial product… I believe we can do more.”
Senator Bragg is a proponent of clearer crypto regulations, and recently introduced an ambitious new proposal concerning decentralized autonomous organizations (DAO) at Australia Blockchain Week last month.
As someone who may now be considered an unlicensed finfluencer, Gow takes exception to restrictions on what they now may not do, which is make any sort of recommendation. He added that the rule limits influencers to simply “parroting what you can read elsewhere” and harms the investor knowledge base. He stated, “How does that help you wade through the sea of information and nonsense out there?”
Individual influencers must be cautious about how they advertise financial products under Australia’s Corporations Act, while corporations must keep a tight eye on their hired influencers to ensure no restrictions are broken. The commission provides many case studies that provide context for determining whether someone or a company is pushing financial services.
DISCLAIMER: The Information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Join CoinCu Telegram to keep track of news: https://t.me/coincunews
Follow CoinCu Youtube Channel | Follow CoinCu Facebook page
Annie
CoinCu News
Data from Coinglass has unveiled staggering figures of liquidated contracts, shaking both seasoned investors and…
Over 84% of the staked Sui token supply is controlled by the founders, raising centralization…
The Coinbase class action lawsuit, echoing a previous case against the exchange, accuses it of…
Tether's CEO, Paolo Ardoino, highlights discrepancies in the Bitfinex data breach, revealing that only a…
Bitfinex data leak allegedly by FSOCIETY includes 2.5TB of exchange data and 400K users' details.…
According to Parsec, Friend Tech v2's launch disappointed many, with 95% users unable to claim…
This website uses cookies.