Coincu
Gemini
Crypto Exchanges

Gemini

7.7/10
Score
Gemini
Crypto Exchanges

Gemini Review

7.7/10
Good
Gemini
Gemini
By Andrej Gjorgievski · Contributing Author
Verdict

Gemini competes on trust, not price. Customer funds are held 1:1, client assets are segregated from the company balance sheet, and the Trust Center publishes audited financials and SOC examinations annually. For US users who want a compliance-first exchange, that disclosure stack is stronger than most centralized peers offer. The fee structure is the main friction point. ActiveTrader base spot starts at 0.60% maker and 1.20% taker, and users who stay on the default retail flow pay more than they need to. Switching to ActiveTrader and using limit orders fixes most of that, but it requires knowing the option exists. There is also no user-verifiable Merkle-tree proof of reserves, so independent solvency verification relies on audit reports rather than direct balance checks. Use Gemini if you are a US user who prioritizes custody transparency and a regulated domestic platform. Skip it if you want low entry fees, broad international access, or a user-queryable proof of reserves.

Pros
  • Audited financials + SOC exams, published
  • NYDFS trust charter; 1:1 assets, off balance sheet
  • Available in all 50 states, plus PR & D.C.
  • Credit card: up to 4% crypto back, no annual fee
  • ActiveTrader fees fall with volume (0% top tier)
Cons
  • High base fees (0.600% maker / 1.200% taker)
  • Shrinking intl access (UK/EEA/AU exits 2026)
  • No user-verifiable PoR (Merkle tree)
  • Support reputation lags trust-first branding
  • Narrower asset breadth vs global exchanges

FAQ

Written by
Andrej Gjorgievski
Contributing Author
Fact-checked by
George Ong
Last updated
Jul 15, 2026