Coincu
MetaMask Wallet
Crypto Wallets

MetaMask Wallet

8.2/10
Score
MetaMask Wallet
Crypto Wallets

MetaMask Wallet Review

8.2/10
Good
MetaMask Wallet
MetaMask Wallet
By Andrej Gjorgievski · Contributing Author
Verdict

8.2 reflects a wallet that leads its category with real asterisks attached. Custody integrity is flawless, the security defaults (simulation, alerts, hardware pairing) are the best of the mainstream hot wallets, the multichain expansion is genuine rather than marketing, and the two disclosed incidents were peripheral and handled openly. Against that: the swap and ramp fees are above market, the license is proprietary despite public repositories, ETH staking excludes American and British users entirely, and MetaMask's size makes its users the primary target of every new drainer technique. A hardware wallet beats it for storage, and cheaper tools beat it for trading. As the daily driver for on-chain activity, nothing else is as universally supported.

Pros
  • Real self-custody, Consensys cannot touch keys
  • Native Solana, Bitcoin, and Tron from one phrase
  • Default transaction simulation and scam alerts
  • Pairs with Ledger and Trezor for cold signing
  • Deepest dApp reach of any mainstream hot wallet
Cons
  • 0.875% swap fee on top of pool costs
  • ETH staking blocked for US and UK users
  • Crypto's most drainer-targeted wallet
  • Source-available license, not open source
  • No secure element, browser-level exposure

FAQ

Written by
Andrej Gjorgievski
Contributing Author
Fact-checked by
George Ong
Last updated
Jul 24, 2026