6 REVIEWS
Decentralized Exchanges
Expert-reviewed, scored out of 10. Sorted by editorial rating.
6 results
#
Platform
Score
Top Pros
1
Uniswap Labs
5 pros · 4 cons
8.3
Good
✓Non-custodial design means Uniswap Labs does not hold user wallet balances.
✓Broad coverage across 17+ supported networks gives users deep onchain market access.
2
Jupiter
5 pros · 4 cons
8.1
Good
✓Wallet-first trading access with support for Jupiter Wallet, Phantom, Backpack, Ledger, and Trezor.
✓Ultra swap fees can be as low as 0% on some routes, with 0.02% on SOL to stable pairs and 0.1% on most other swaps.
3
PancakeSwap
4 pros · 4 cons
7.9
Good
✓Available across 10 chains, with swapping, liquidity, rewards, perpetuals, prediction, lottery, and CAKE.PAD in one interface.
✓Non-custodial by design. PancakeSwap says users keep 100% ownership of their crypto.
4
Hyperliquid Labs
4 pros · 4 cons
7.5
Good
✓Very competitive trading fees, with separate spot and perp schedules plus extra discounts from staking and referrals.
✓Strong pro feature set for a crypto-native venue, including spot, perps, vaults, staking, sub-accounts, agent wallets, and public API access.
5
Raydium
5 pros · 4 cons
6.8
Fair
✓Broad Solana product stack with swaps, perps, liquidity pools, LaunchLab, and yield tools.
✓Swap fees start at 0.01%, and perps charge 0 bps maker with tiered 2–4.5 bps taker fees.
