Major Media Outlets Want The Names Of SBF’s $250 Million Bond Guaranteeors
Key Points:
- The two people in charge of securing the $250 million bond for former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried have to be made public, according to eight significant media outlets.
- The media’s lawyers used case precedent from Ghislaine Maxwell’s Dec. 2020 case — where the bond guarantors’ names weren’t revealed — to argue that Sam Bankman-Fried’s financial crimes were not as serious as Maxwell’s involvement in Jeffery Epstein’s child sex traffic ring scandal.
The two people in charge of securing the $250 million bond for former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) have to be made public, according to eight significant media outlets, including Bloomberg, The Financial Times, and Reuters.
In a letter dated Jan. 12 issued to New York District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan, lawyers for the media moguls claimed that “the public’s entitlement to know Bankman-guarantors Fried’s outweighed their privacy and safety rights.”
The Washington Post, Associated Press, Bloomberg, CNBC, Dow Jones, The Financial Times, Insider, and Dow Jones are among the media outlets attempting to urge the judge to reveal the names of Bankman-guarantors. Fried’s
In making their case, the media’s lawyers used case precedent from Ghislaine Maxwell’s Dec. 2020 case — where the bond guarantors’ names weren’t revealed — to argue that Sam Bankman-Fried’s financial crimes were not as serious as Maxwell’s involvement in Jeffery Epstein’s child sex traffic ring scandal:
“While Mr. Bankman-Fried is accused of serious financial crimes, a public association with him does not carry nearly the same stigma as with the Jeffrey Epstein child sex trafficking scandal.”
Reuters reported on January 12 that Bankman-attorneys Fried had previously argued that Bankman-sureties Fried should remain anonymous because Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried, Bankman-parents Fried and co-signers of the $250 million bond, have been the target of persistent physical threats ever since FTX’s disastrous collapse in early November.
The guarantors’ welfare and safety would be “serious cause for concern” if their names were made public, according to Bankman.
DISCLAIMER: The Information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Join us to keep track of news: https://linktr.ee/coincu
Website: coincu.com
Annie
Coincu News
Author
News
Major Media Outlets Want The Names Of SBF’s $250 Million Bond Guaranteeors
Key Points:
- The two people in charge of securing the $250 million bond for former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried have to be made public, according to eight significant media outlets.
- The media’s lawyers used case precedent from Ghislaine Maxwell’s Dec. 2020 case — where the bond guarantors’ names weren’t revealed — to argue that Sam Bankman-Fried’s financial crimes were not as serious as Maxwell’s involvement in Jeffery Epstein’s child sex traffic ring scandal.
The two people in charge of securing the $250 million bond for former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) have to be made public, according to eight significant media outlets, including Bloomberg, The Financial Times, and Reuters.
In a letter dated Jan. 12 issued to New York District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan, lawyers for the media moguls claimed that “the public’s entitlement to know Bankman-guarantors Fried’s outweighed their privacy and safety rights.”
The Washington Post, Associated Press, Bloomberg, CNBC, Dow Jones, The Financial Times, Insider, and Dow Jones are among the media outlets attempting to urge the judge to reveal the names of Bankman-guarantors. Fried’s
In making their case, the media’s lawyers used case precedent from Ghislaine Maxwell’s Dec. 2020 case — where the bond guarantors’ names weren’t revealed — to argue that Sam Bankman-Fried’s financial crimes were not as serious as Maxwell’s involvement in Jeffery Epstein’s child sex traffic ring scandal:
“While Mr. Bankman-Fried is accused of serious financial crimes, a public association with him does not carry nearly the same stigma as with the Jeffrey Epstein child sex trafficking scandal.”
Reuters reported on January 12 that Bankman-attorneys Fried had previously argued that Bankman-sureties Fried should remain anonymous because Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried, Bankman-parents Fried and co-signers of the $250 million bond, have been the target of persistent physical threats ever since FTX’s disastrous collapse in early November.
The guarantors’ welfare and safety would be “serious cause for concern” if their names were made public, according to Bankman.
DISCLAIMER: The Information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Join us to keep track of news: https://linktr.ee/coincu
Website: coincu.com
Annie
Coincu News
Other Posts
Related Posts
Latest
Best Altcoins to Buy for 2025: Qubetics Presale Surge, Solana’s Lightning Speed, and Cardano’s Blockchain Revolution
Why Qubetics, NEAR Protocol, and IMX Are Dominating Crypto: The Best Altcoins to Join Today for Game-Changing Returns
Bonk’s ICO Was Just the Start: Why BTFD Coin’s Stage 7 Price Rollback Is Your Second Shot at Crypto Glory
Press Release
Best Altcoins to Buy for 2025: Qubetics Presale Surge, Solana’s Lightning Speed, and Cardano’s Blockchain Revolution
Why Qubetics, NEAR Protocol, and IMX Are Dominating Crypto: The Best Altcoins to Join Today for Game-Changing Returns
