NFTs News

US SEC Commissioner Opposes First SEC Sanctions Action Against NFT

Key Points:

  • US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) commissioners Hester Peirce and Mark Uyeda opposed the Commission’s enforcement actions against the NFT.
  • Part of the reason is that they disagree with the rules for applying the Howey test.
  • The SEC is long overdue to address these issues and provide guidance as the NFT evolves.
US Securities and Exchange Commission commissioners Hester Peirce and Mark Uyeda objected to the Commission’s enforcement actions to treat the sale of NFTs as securities. They said, in part, they disagreed with the Howey test rules. The SEC did not have sufficient grounds to bring this matter into its jurisdiction.

Certain statements by the company and the buyer cited in the non-promising order constitute an investment contract. Even if NFT sales fully complied with Howey’s regulations, more than a series of events would be required to warrant enforcement action.

According to the trustees, as the first NFT settlement, this enforcement action raises many conundrums. The Commission should have addressed these questions long ago and provided guidance when the NFT began spreading. The SEC is long overdue to address these issues and provide advice as the NFT evolves. Discussing the NFT can now help the Commission handle the matter wisely.

Hester Peirce said that the NFT is not an asset class with a single use case and that different NFTs have many use cases, so the Commission may need a new category to determine how the law should be applied to securities for incentives and sales.

As previously reported, the SEC has accused Los Angeles entertainment company Impact Theory of issuing NFTs without registration, which is also the regulator’s first enforcement action against the NFT.

The Commission’s enforcement underscores the need for compliance and transparency in the evolving landscape of crypto assets and NFTs. It is one of the rare times the agency has noticed “interest” in this area.

In response to the allegations, Impact Theory agreed to a settlement with them paying fines of more than $6.1 million. In addition, the company will return the investment amount to the stakeholders and guarantee the destruction of the NFTs associated with the offering.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.

Victor

Recent Posts

Why Qubetics, NEAR Protocol, and IMX Are Dominating Crypto: The Best Altcoins to Join Today for Game-Changing Returns 

Discover why Qubetics, NEAR Protocol, and Immutable X are the best altcoins to join today,…

1 hour ago

Bonk’s ICO Was Just the Start: Why BTFD Coin’s Stage 7 Price Rollback Is Your Second Shot at Crypto Glory

BTFD Coin is offering a chance to relive the glory days of meme coin investing,…

2 hours ago

Decoding BDAG’s AMA: A Blueprint for Scalable Blockchain and Enhanced Community Ties

Explore key takeaways from BlockDAG’s AMA, showcasing strides in scalability, growth of the ecosystem, and…

3 hours ago

Best Cryptos with 1000X Potential: Qubetics Revolutionises Blockchain as Polkadot and Cosmos Shape the Future

Discover why Qubetics, Polkadot, and Cosmos are the best cryptos with 1000X potential, offering innovation,…

6 hours ago

Best Coins to Buy in December 2024: Qubetics Offer 630% ROI, Polkadot Delivers on Interoperability and Near Protocol’s Scalability is Talk of the Town

Explore the best coins to buy in December 2024—Qubetics with its thrilling presale, Polkadot’s interoperability,…

12 hours ago

Crypto Market Outlook 2025 Key Factors to Watch

The Crypto Market Outlook 2025 highlights key areas: stablecoin growth, tokenization, crypto ETFs, DeFi innovation,…

15 hours ago

This website uses cookies.