
Intesa Sanpaolo Bitcoin ETF holdings: ~$96M disclosed in 13F filing
Italy’s largest bank, Intesa Sanpaolo, reported exposure to approximately $96 million of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs in its fourth-quarter 2025 portfolio disclosure. Based on data from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (Form 13F), the positions were held as of December 31, 2025.
The filing lists exposure via ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) and iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), indicating use of regulated, exchange-traded vehicles rather than direct token custody. Because Form 13F reports quarter-end positions and is filed weeks later, the holdings may have changed after the reporting date.
For a bank of Intesa Sanpaolo’s scale, the dollar amount is modest in balance-sheet terms, but it is notable as a formal, regulated footprint in spot Bitcoin exposure. The disclosure places a large European institution within the same ETF ecosystem used by U.S. asset managers and advisers.
Why this disclosure matters for European banks and clients
For European banks, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs offer a supervised access point that can fit within existing control frameworks and product-governance rules. Using ETFs also helps separate market exposure from on-chain custody risks and operational complexities.
Coverage of the filing underscored the move’s significance for an Italian incumbent. “Italian banking giant Intesa Sanpaolo has revealed nearly $100 million in Bitcoin ETF holdings,” said Crypto.news, referencing the bank’s latest 13F disclosure.
For clients, ETF-based exposure can simplify suitability assessments, reporting, and safekeeping relative to direct crypto holdings. The filing signals a pathway for institutions to meet demand through regulated wrappers without implying a broader endorsement of the asset.
Immediate implications: ARKB, IBIT mix, risk posture, market context
Splitting exposure across ARKB and IBIT suggests diversification across leading, liquid spot vehicles. Concentration risks can be reduced when allocations span multiple issuers and operational setups within the same asset class.
Risk posture appears calibrated rather than directional. The bank’s use of ETF wrappers, combined with hedging tactics discussed below, indicates an emphasis on managed exposure over high-conviction speculation.
At the time of this writing, Intesa Sanpaolo shares (ISP.MI) traded around €5.97 on a delayed Milan quote, based on data from Yahoo Finance. This provides a neutral backdrop for interpreting the disclosure within the issuer’s broader market context.
Filing details: ARKB vs IBIT split, hedges, and 13F timing
Form 13F captures U.S.-listed equity securities and certain options as of the quarter’s end, typically published several weeks later. It is a position snapshot, not a real-time view, and does not include all risk exposures or cash balances.
Alongside the ETF positions, the disclosure cycle has been discussed in parallel reporting with a sizable put-option position on MicroStrategy, a Bitcoin-treasury proxy. Coindoo attributed that hedge to Intesa Sanpaolo in coverage of the filing period, describing it as a risk-management complement to long ETF exposure.
Holdings split between ARK 21Shares (ARKB) and iShares (IBIT)
As of December 31, 2025, about $72.6 million was in ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF and roughly $23.4 million in iShares Bitcoin Trust, as reported by Archyde. The figures indicate a majority weighting to ARKB with a meaningful allocation to IBIT.
Why pair ETF exposure with MicroStrategy put options
MicroStrategy’s equity is highly sensitive to Bitcoin moves and corporate leverage, making puts on the stock a potential tail-risk hedge. As covered by Coindoo, pairing long ETF exposure with such options can help cushion drawdowns or dislocations.
FAQ about Intesa Sanpaolo Bitcoin ETF holdings
How much of Intesa’s position is in ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) versus iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)?
Approximately $72.6 million in ARKB and $23.4 million in IBIT as of December 31, 2025, as reported by Archyde.
Are these Bitcoin ETF holdings proprietary trading or client-directed, and what does any DFND/shared designation imply?
Filings don’t state this. Some coverage interprets DFND/shared as shared investment discretion aligned with client-directed flows, according to AInvest.
| DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing. |










