- Major market volatility prompts Eugene Ng to adjust trading strategy.
- Bitcoin and Plasma experience significant market movements.
- Decision reflects cautious market stance among traders.
On October 11th, prominent trader Eugene Ng Ah Sio reported structural damage in the cryptocurrency market, marking a transition into a new cycle phase with increased volatility and risk.
Ng’s insight underscores heightened volatility driving traders to reassess strategies, notably impacting Bitcoin and Plasma with increased caution and liquidity adjustments amid wider market deleveraging.
Eugene Ng Halts Bitcoin Longs Amid Market Turbulence
Eugene Ng Ah Sio, a prominent trader, recently halted his Bitcoin long positions, attributing his move to extensive market volatility. After seeing an unfavorable turn in the market conditions, Eugene’s decision to step back aligns with his cautious approach in high-risk trading situations.
This move highlights an immediate impact where Bitcoin and Plasma (XPL) registered significant price fluctuations. Increased volatility forced traders to reconsider positions, contributing to market instability as traders recalibrate their strategies.
“Bitcoin long positions have been stopped out, preparing to take a break and reorganize. The recent bullish view was not very accurate, and the market has also been volatile.” — Eugene Ng Ah Sio, Trader
Bitcoin’s Market Cap Drops as Volatility Surges
Did you know? Structural shifts and market responses can greatly influence asset behaviors, mirroring scenarios from past volatility periods where significant price adjustments followed strategic trader actions.
According to CoinMarketCap, Bitcoin’s current value stands at $112,491.22, with a market cap of $2.24 trillion. It commands a dominant market share of 60.14%, reflecting its significance amid volatile conditions. Recent price fluctuations show a 7.35% decrease over 24 hours, underscoring traders’ cautious approach.
The Coincu research team highlights the sustained market volatility and advises traders to maintain strategic precautions. Historical precedent suggests that tech-driven sectors may see increased scrutiny from regulatory bodies amid significant price corrections, prompting caution among traders and stakeholders.
| DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing. |










