Suspected Insider Trading in ATLAS Memecoin Uncovered

Key Points:
  • 68 wallets allegedly involved in significant pre-launch purchases.
  • Insiders suspected of holding 47% of ATLAS supply.
  • Concerns of market manipulation and regulatory scrutiny.

On December 28, Bubblemaps reported potential insider trading involving the ATLAS memecoin, with 68 wallets acquiring 47% of the token supply before its official launch.

This concentration raises concerns about transparency and market manipulation in the cryptocurrency sector, with ATLAS showing a significant ownership imbalance after early acquisitions.

Concentrated Tokens in 68 Wallets Raise Manipulation Concerns

The wallets, suspected of belonging to insiders, acquired 47% of the memecoin supply via ChangeNow, translating to approximately $1 million in holdings.

Industry insiders have expressed concern, with Bubblemaps pointing to potential insider trading practices. The analytic platform’s findings reveal a significant pre-launch purchase of ATLAS tokens, suggesting actions inconsistent with organic trading behaviors.

68 wallets with no prior on‑chain history were funded via ChangeNow, then rushed to buy ATLAS pre-launch, now holding 47% of supply worth about $1M, suggesting insider trading. — Bubblemaps

ATLAS Case Parallels Historic Memecoin Speculation Risks

Did you know? ATLAS holds parallels with previous memecoin launches where concentrated pre-launch ownership catalyzed rapid speculation, reminiscent of historic memecoin booms.

According to CoinMarketCap, Star Atlas, currently valued at $0.00, exhibits a market cap of $6.80 million. The trading volume has surged by 514.26% within 24 hours, totaling over $1.05 million. Recent data shows price fluctuations with an 8.52% increase in 24 hours, though the value has plummeted 61.87% over 90 days.

star-atlas-daily-chart
Star Atlas(ATLAS), daily chart, screenshot on CoinMarketCap at 20:48 UTC on December 28, 2025. Source: CoinMarketCap

Coincu research suggests that the concentration of such a large token supply with few addresses amplifies risks associated with volatility and market manipulation. Analysts argue that these factors, coupled with lack of transparency, could invite stricter regulatory scrutiny in the crypto industry.

Rate this post

Other Posts: