Binance Responds to ZEROBASE Hack by Blocking Malicious Domains

Key Points:
  • Main event, leadership changes, market impact, financial shifts, or expert insights.
  • Binance blocks domains, alerts users within 30 minutes.
  • ZEROBASE platform impersonation risks user security via phishing contracts.

The Binance Wallet team has confirmed that ZEROBASE’s front end was hacked, leading users to authorize a malicious contract, prompting immediate emergency security measures on December 12.

The incident highlights ongoing security vulnerabilities in the crypto space, urging quick responses to minimize asset losses and maintain trust in digital platforms.

Binance Responds to ZEROBASE Hack by Blocking Malicious Domains

Changpeng Zhao, Co-founder, Binance, confirmed the breach and warned, “pointing out the poor security of traditional social platforms.” Some participants on social platforms emphasized the need for enhanced security protocols across similar blockchain services.

Experts from Coincu have expressed concerns about the long-term implications of such hacks, suggesting that increased regulation may pressure crypto companies to adopt stricter security measures. They also emphasize the evolving technological landscape that might necessitate higher standards for user protection.

ZEROBASE Breach Highlights Blockchain Security Challenges

Did you know? Zero-Day exploits like the ZEROBASE incident exemplify ongoing challenges in securing blockchain networks, reminiscent of larger hacks like Bybit’s 2025 $1.5 billion loss.

CoinMarketCap reports Tether USDt’s current price at $1.00, with a market cap of $186.18 billion, reflecting a 90-day price decline of 3.37%. Recent trading volume stands at $87.00 billion, indicating significant market activities despite phishing risks on platforms like BNB Chain.

tether-usdt-daily-chart-404
Tether USDt(USDT), daily chart, screenshot on CoinMarketCap at 15:31 UTC on December 12, 2025. Source: CoinMarketCap

Experts from Coincu have expressed concerns about the long-term implications of such hacks, suggesting that increased regulation may pressure crypto companies to adopt stricter security measures. They also emphasize the evolving technological landscape that might necessitate higher standards for user protection.

Rate this post

Other Posts: