BTC

$98715.147

5.72%

ETH

$3362.584

10.77%

BNB

$622.355

3.59%

XRP

$1.201

12.27%

DeFi

Balancer’s Losses Exceeded $2.1 Million, Multiple On-chain Fund Pools Were Affected

August 28, 2023 - Around 2 mins mins to read

Key Points:

  • The Balancer protocol suffers over $2.1 million in losses across Ethereum, Fantom, and Optimism due to exploited vulnerabilities in V2 pools.
  • The platform’s swift response minimizes the impact, but users are urged to withdraw funds from affected pools to prevent further attacks.
  • The breach highlights the urgency of accurate risk assessment and proactive measures to secure decentralized finance platforms.
Decentralized Finance (DeFi) protocol Balancer recently faced a staggering loss surpassing $2.1 million, impacting multiple fund pools across Ethereum, Fantom, and Optimism.
Balancer’s Losses Exceeded $2.1 Million, Multiple On-chain Fund Pools Were Affected
Balancer’s Losses Exceeded $2.1 Million, Multiple On-chain Fund Pools Were Affected 2

PeckShield’s analysis highlighted the aftermath of this breach, shedding light on the repercussions that affected these diverse platforms.

While the Balancer team promptly notified users to withdraw liquidity from vulnerable vaults, the initial risk assessment of only “0.08% of the total TVL ($565,199)” appeared significantly underestimated.

Balancer’s V2 pools, despite previous vulnerability alerts, were exploited, resulting in undisclosed losses. The protocol’s mitigation efforts minimized the breach’s impact, yet cautionary measures were advised for users to withdraw their funds from compromised pools to thwart potential future attacks.

Multiple flash loans orchestrated the attack on Balancer, culminating in a loss nearing $900,000. The protocol’s team swiftly acknowledged the exploit tied to the disclosed vulnerability and adopted mitigation strategies to curtail risks. However, stopping the affected pools proved infeasible.

Balancer emphasized the importance of users withdrawing from impacted liquidity pools to prevent further breaches. The vulnerability came to light on August 22nd, prompting an urgent plea for fund withdrawal and leading to temporary pool suspensions.

Despite efforts to communicate the risks and encourage action, the breach still unfolded, revealing that not all users heeded the warnings. Balancer developers had swiftly issued alerts, identifying safe pools and promising a detailed post-mortem analysis with a forthcoming patch.

To ensure their holdings’ safety, users were guided to a newly established portal for risk assessment. Although the developers advised temporary withdrawal from all pools for extra safety, some users failed to act promptly, resulting in the inevitable breach nearly a week later.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.

Balancer

Fantom

optimism

Avatar of Harold

Author

Harold

With a passion for untangling the complexities of the financial world, I've spent over four years in financial journalism, covering everything from traditional equities to the cutting edge of venture capital. "The financial markets are a fascinating puzzle," I often say, "and I love helping people make sense of them." That's what drives me to bring clear and insightful financial journalism to the readers of Coincu.
DeFi

Balancer’s Losses Exceeded $2.1 Million, Multiple On-chain Fund Pools Were Affected

Key Points:

  • The Balancer protocol suffers over $2.1 million in losses across Ethereum, Fantom, and Optimism due to exploited vulnerabilities in V2 pools.
  • The platform’s swift response minimizes the impact, but users are urged to withdraw funds from affected pools to prevent further attacks.
  • The breach highlights the urgency of accurate risk assessment and proactive measures to secure decentralized finance platforms.
Decentralized Finance (DeFi) protocol Balancer recently faced a staggering loss surpassing $2.1 million, impacting multiple fund pools across Ethereum, Fantom, and Optimism.
Balancer’s Losses Exceeded $2.1 Million, Multiple On-chain Fund Pools Were Affected
Balancer’s Losses Exceeded $2.1 Million, Multiple On-chain Fund Pools Were Affected 4

PeckShield’s analysis highlighted the aftermath of this breach, shedding light on the repercussions that affected these diverse platforms.

While the Balancer team promptly notified users to withdraw liquidity from vulnerable vaults, the initial risk assessment of only “0.08% of the total TVL ($565,199)” appeared significantly underestimated.

Balancer’s V2 pools, despite previous vulnerability alerts, were exploited, resulting in undisclosed losses. The protocol’s mitigation efforts minimized the breach’s impact, yet cautionary measures were advised for users to withdraw their funds from compromised pools to thwart potential future attacks.

Multiple flash loans orchestrated the attack on Balancer, culminating in a loss nearing $900,000. The protocol’s team swiftly acknowledged the exploit tied to the disclosed vulnerability and adopted mitigation strategies to curtail risks. However, stopping the affected pools proved infeasible.

Balancer emphasized the importance of users withdrawing from impacted liquidity pools to prevent further breaches. The vulnerability came to light on August 22nd, prompting an urgent plea for fund withdrawal and leading to temporary pool suspensions.

Despite efforts to communicate the risks and encourage action, the breach still unfolded, revealing that not all users heeded the warnings. Balancer developers had swiftly issued alerts, identifying safe pools and promising a detailed post-mortem analysis with a forthcoming patch.

To ensure their holdings’ safety, users were guided to a newly established portal for risk assessment. Although the developers advised temporary withdrawal from all pools for extra safety, some users failed to act promptly, resulting in the inevitable breach nearly a week later.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.