Billions Invested Despite Alameda Risk Exposure, SBF Reveals
Key Points:
- Sam Bankman-Fried admitted to being aware of Alameda Research’s failure to hedge its risk before approving billions of dollars of investments.
- During his testimony, Bankman-Fried provided concise answers initially but became less certain as questions approached FTX’s failure in November 2022.
BBG reported that Sam Bankman-Fried, co-founder of FTX, admitted in court that he approved billions of dollars in investments despite Alameda risk exposure. The trial continues with cross-examination.
Sam Bankman-Fried, co-founder of FTX, admitted in a New York court that he was aware of Alameda Research’s failure to properly hedge its risk. Despite this knowledge, he approved investments totaling billions of dollars before both companies collapsed in 2022.
Bankman-Fried’s Awareness of Alameda Risk Exposure
Bankman-Fried acknowledged that he knew Alameda had not hedged when it repaid its lenders, although he couldn’t recall the exact date. He faces charges for allegedly directing the transfer of FTX customer funds into Alameda for investments, political donations, and real estate, just before both companies filed for bankruptcy.
During his testimony, Bankman-Fried initially provided more concise answers compared to a previous hearing. However, as Sassoon’s questioning approached FTX’s failure in November 2022, Bankman-Fried frequently responded with “not sure” and received admonitions from the judge to be more direct.
Assistant US Attorney Challenges Bankman-Fried’s Testimony
Sassoon confronted Bankman-Fried with his public and private statements that contradicted the narrative he wanted the jury to believe about his role in the collapse.
Sassoon portrayed Bankman-Fried as a storyteller who tailored his testimony after reviewing the government’s evidence against him. She highlighted numerous comments he made on social media, in press interviews, and before Congress. Bankman-Fried’s support for crypto industry regulation was questioned after Sassoon presented a Twitter direct-message exchange in which he expressed a different sentiment.
The trial attracted significant attention, with reporters lining up for press seats. Sassoon challenged Bankman-Fried’s public image and questioned aspects such as his appearance and self-perception. Bankman-Fried’s testimony marked a crucial moment in the trial, as he tried to apologize for the events leading to FTX’s failure.
Coincu will continue to update the situation related to Sam Bankman-Fried, you can find out more information through this article.
DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Author
News
Billions Invested Despite Alameda Risk Exposure, SBF Reveals
Key Points:
- Sam Bankman-Fried admitted to being aware of Alameda Research’s failure to hedge its risk before approving billions of dollars of investments.
- During his testimony, Bankman-Fried provided concise answers initially but became less certain as questions approached FTX’s failure in November 2022.
BBG reported that Sam Bankman-Fried, co-founder of FTX, admitted in court that he approved billions of dollars in investments despite Alameda risk exposure. The trial continues with cross-examination.
Sam Bankman-Fried, co-founder of FTX, admitted in a New York court that he was aware of Alameda Research’s failure to properly hedge its risk. Despite this knowledge, he approved investments totaling billions of dollars before both companies collapsed in 2022.
Bankman-Fried’s Awareness of Alameda Risk Exposure
Bankman-Fried acknowledged that he knew Alameda had not hedged when it repaid its lenders, although he couldn’t recall the exact date. He faces charges for allegedly directing the transfer of FTX customer funds into Alameda for investments, political donations, and real estate, just before both companies filed for bankruptcy.
During his testimony, Bankman-Fried initially provided more concise answers compared to a previous hearing. However, as Sassoon’s questioning approached FTX’s failure in November 2022, Bankman-Fried frequently responded with “not sure” and received admonitions from the judge to be more direct.
Assistant US Attorney Challenges Bankman-Fried’s Testimony
Sassoon confronted Bankman-Fried with his public and private statements that contradicted the narrative he wanted the jury to believe about his role in the collapse.
Sassoon portrayed Bankman-Fried as a storyteller who tailored his testimony after reviewing the government’s evidence against him. She highlighted numerous comments he made on social media, in press interviews, and before Congress. Bankman-Fried’s support for crypto industry regulation was questioned after Sassoon presented a Twitter direct-message exchange in which he expressed a different sentiment.
The trial attracted significant attention, with reporters lining up for press seats. Sassoon challenged Bankman-Fried’s public image and questioned aspects such as his appearance and self-perception. Bankman-Fried’s testimony marked a crucial moment in the trial, as he tried to apologize for the events leading to FTX’s failure.
Coincu will continue to update the situation related to Sam Bankman-Fried, you can find out more information through this article.
DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Other Posts
Related Posts
Latest
Nexon and Wemade Confirm No Plans to Profit from Bitcoin Holdings
Press Release
Arcana Network Launches the First Ever Chain Abstraction Wallet, Ushering a New Era of Multi-Chain Transactions
