Tether And Bitfinex Do Not Object To FOIL Requests To Ensuring Transparency
Key Points:
- Tether and Bitfinex abandon their opposition to a FOIL request, affirming their commitment to transparency.
- While refraining from open documentation releases, Tether and Bitfinex vow transparent communication despite concerns over journalists’ conduct.
- The companies respond to past journalistic criticisms, emphasizing responsible engagement with reporters and regulatory bodies.
Tether and Bitfinex, in a joint decision, have opted to withdraw their initial opposition to a Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request filed in New York by prominent news outlets.
Tether and Bitfinex Pivot on FOIL Request
The move, revealed in a statement, underscores the commitment to transparency, responding to a FOIL request initiated by CoinDesk earlier this year.
While the companies have chosen not to openly release documentation, citing a misalignment with their business practices, they emphasized a dedication to transparent communication. Despite reservations about the conduct of journalists Zeke Faux, Shane Shifflett, and Ada Hui, who lodged the FOIL request, Tether and Bitfinex opted not to challenge it.
The Companies Address Transparency Concerns
Addressing concerns related to journalistic practices, the stablecoin issuer and crypto exchange pledged to engage responsibly with journalists and regulatory bodies, adhering to ethical reporting standards. They acknowledged concerns about the conduct of specific journalists but asserted their commitment to transparency, denying any intention to conceal information.
Tether and Bitfinex also tackled past criticisms of journalistic practices, accusing Zeke Faux of extending beyond the bounds of professional journalism. They claimed media outlets like The Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg presented “one-sided and inaccurate” coverage.
Emphasizing the importance of responsible document review before public release, the companies stressed that transparency doesn’t equate to unrestricted disclosure, highlighting a commitment to balanced reporting within ethical boundaries.
DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Author
News
Tether And Bitfinex Do Not Object To FOIL Requests To Ensuring Transparency
Key Points:
- Tether and Bitfinex abandon their opposition to a FOIL request, affirming their commitment to transparency.
- While refraining from open documentation releases, Tether and Bitfinex vow transparent communication despite concerns over journalists’ conduct.
- The companies respond to past journalistic criticisms, emphasizing responsible engagement with reporters and regulatory bodies.
Tether and Bitfinex, in a joint decision, have opted to withdraw their initial opposition to a Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request filed in New York by prominent news outlets.
Tether and Bitfinex Pivot on FOIL Request
The move, revealed in a statement, underscores the commitment to transparency, responding to a FOIL request initiated by CoinDesk earlier this year.
While the companies have chosen not to openly release documentation, citing a misalignment with their business practices, they emphasized a dedication to transparent communication. Despite reservations about the conduct of journalists Zeke Faux, Shane Shifflett, and Ada Hui, who lodged the FOIL request, Tether and Bitfinex opted not to challenge it.
The Companies Address Transparency Concerns
Addressing concerns related to journalistic practices, the stablecoin issuer and crypto exchange pledged to engage responsibly with journalists and regulatory bodies, adhering to ethical reporting standards. They acknowledged concerns about the conduct of specific journalists but asserted their commitment to transparency, denying any intention to conceal information.
Tether and Bitfinex also tackled past criticisms of journalistic practices, accusing Zeke Faux of extending beyond the bounds of professional journalism. They claimed media outlets like The Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg presented “one-sided and inaccurate” coverage.
Emphasizing the importance of responsible document review before public release, the companies stressed that transparency doesn’t equate to unrestricted disclosure, highlighting a commitment to balanced reporting within ethical boundaries.
DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Other Posts
Related Posts
Latest
Bonk’s ICO Was Just the Start: Why BTFD Coin’s Stage 7 Price Rollback Is Your Second Shot at Crypto Glory
Decoding BDAG’s AMA: A Blueprint for Scalable Blockchain and Enhanced Community Ties
Best Cryptos with 1000X Potential: Qubetics Revolutionises Blockchain as Polkadot and Cosmos Shape the Future
Press Release
Bonk’s ICO Was Just the Start: Why BTFD Coin’s Stage 7 Price Rollback Is Your Second Shot at Crypto Glory
Decoding BDAG’s AMA: A Blueprint for Scalable Blockchain and Enhanced Community Ties
