BTC

$95445.686

-1.77%

ETH

$3344.406

-0.33%

XRP

$2.211

-1.50%

BNB

$662.219

-0.25%

Market

Johnny Dang & Co. On Google Is Rated 1-Star, Wiki Information Was Edited To A Scammer

December 2, 2021 - Around 2 mins mins to read

It is unknown how the facts regarding Khoa Pug accusing Johnny Dang of cheating came to light. However, the majority of the comments indicated their support and faith in this YouTuber and boycotted the entertainment industry’s top celebrity jeweler. And, as usual, the internet community is calling for Johnny Dang’s firm to be given a one-star rating.

Johnny Dang & Co. On Google Is Rated 1-Star, Wiki Information Was Edited To A Scammer

Things reached a tipping point when a remark urging a one-star review for the famous Jewelry firm gained over 1,000 likes. And so, whatever occurred, a big number of online communities hastened to produce a 1-star storm on Google for Johnny Dang & Co. of the king of gems.

Currently, just a small fraction of the company’s 25,409 Google reviews have been given five stars for quite some time. The remainder is simply a fresh 1-star review. The majority of the comments are in Vietnamese, with terms like “holy sucker,” “scam,” and so on.

The issue had a detrimental impact on Johnny Dang’s company website. The value of the DBZ currency — the root of the separation between Khoa Pug and Johnny Dang – has also decreased. The DBZ currency plummeted by one-third overnight from $0.025 to $0.017 late on November 30. In two months, the cryptocurrency price launched by Johnny Dang has dropped 90 percent from its peak of $ 0.145 on September 28.

Johnny Dang & Co. On Google Is Rated 1-Star, Wiki Information Was Edited To A Scammer

Not content with that, some die-hard Khoa Pug fans tainted Johnny Dang’s Wikipedia entry with filthy and sensitive language.

This issue, however, was promptly identified and resolved. The function of editing and updating data on the Dang’s Wikipedia page has similarly been disabled. When this conduct was published on social media, it elicited conflicting opinions from the online community, with the majority of people criticizing it and believing it to be uncivilized behavior.

Patrick

Coincu News

Market

Johnny Dang & Co. On Google Is Rated 1-Star, Wiki Information Was Edited To A Scammer

It is unknown how the facts regarding Khoa Pug accusing Johnny Dang of cheating came to light. However, the majority of the comments indicated their support and faith in this YouTuber and boycotted the entertainment industry’s top celebrity jeweler. And, as usual, the internet community is calling for Johnny Dang’s firm to be given a one-star rating.

Johnny Dang & Co. On Google Is Rated 1-Star, Wiki Information Was Edited To A Scammer

Things reached a tipping point when a remark urging a one-star review for the famous Jewelry firm gained over 1,000 likes. And so, whatever occurred, a big number of online communities hastened to produce a 1-star storm on Google for Johnny Dang & Co. of the king of gems.

Currently, just a small fraction of the company’s 25,409 Google reviews have been given five stars for quite some time. The remainder is simply a fresh 1-star review. The majority of the comments are in Vietnamese, with terms like “holy sucker,” “scam,” and so on.

The issue had a detrimental impact on Johnny Dang’s company website. The value of the DBZ currency — the root of the separation between Khoa Pug and Johnny Dang – has also decreased. The DBZ currency plummeted by one-third overnight from $0.025 to $0.017 late on November 30. In two months, the cryptocurrency price launched by Johnny Dang has dropped 90 percent from its peak of $ 0.145 on September 28.

Johnny Dang & Co. On Google Is Rated 1-Star, Wiki Information Was Edited To A Scammer

Not content with that, some die-hard Khoa Pug fans tainted Johnny Dang’s Wikipedia entry with filthy and sensitive language.

This issue, however, was promptly identified and resolved. The function of editing and updating data on the Dang’s Wikipedia page has similarly been disabled. When this conduct was published on social media, it elicited conflicting opinions from the online community, with the majority of people criticizing it and believing it to be uncivilized behavior.

Patrick

Coincu News

Leave a Reply