GitHub Users Suggest A “Bitcoin Law” In Response To Gillibrand-Bill Lummis
The Responsible Financial Innovation Act, a crypto bill – bitcoin law that may soon regulate industry standards in the United States, is currently open to all interested users (RFIA). The document’s co-sponsors uploaded it to GitHub, a website where software and product specialists congregate, to solicit feedback from the general public.
The entire text of the Responsible Financial Innovation Act was posted in its entirety on GitHub on Wednesday, June 22 by Senators Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand. As the spokespeople for Lummis stated:
“The senators seek comments from industry stakeholders, consumers and interested parties to ensure that this landmark legislation reflects the innovative nature of the industry it regulates, while also adding confidence, trust and stability for consumers.”
At the time of publication, there were six comments posted on the act page, some of which offered a lone war cry (“Taxation is robbery”) and others which suggested questionable changes to the text.
Due to its “absolute scarcity” feature, a user by the name of Stduey argues that Bitcoin is unique and shouldn’t be included with dangerous “assets.”
Justifies a completely distinct bill for Bitcoin:
“If you buy 5,000 satoshis for $1, you will have 5,000/2.1 quadrillion satoshis, forever, and no one can change that. People cannot understand the magnitude of this yet but this subtle difference is what separates Bitcoin from every other crypto, fiat, precious metal, and commodity.”
The inconsistency of the present structure for airdrops is further explained by commenter savage1r, who points out that it relates the taxable value of coins to their entrance price, which may be much greater than during the cash-out phase:
“Airdrop receivers should only have to pay short or long term taxes on the coins they cash out assuming the initial value is $0 because they do not realize the gains until they trade or sell.”
On June 7, the eagerly anticipated RFIA was introduced in the US Senate. The community as a whole agrees that the measure is in favor of cryptocurrency.
DISCLAIMER: The Information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Join CoinCu Telegram to keep track of news: https://t.me/coincunews
Follow CoinCu Youtube Channel | Follow CoinCu Facebook page
Annie
CoinCu News
Author
Bitcoin
GitHub Users Suggest A “Bitcoin Law” In Response To Gillibrand-Bill Lummis
The Responsible Financial Innovation Act, a crypto bill – bitcoin law that may soon regulate industry standards in the United States, is currently open to all interested users (RFIA). The document’s co-sponsors uploaded it to GitHub, a website where software and product specialists congregate, to solicit feedback from the general public.
The entire text of the Responsible Financial Innovation Act was posted in its entirety on GitHub on Wednesday, June 22 by Senators Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand. As the spokespeople for Lummis stated:
“The senators seek comments from industry stakeholders, consumers and interested parties to ensure that this landmark legislation reflects the innovative nature of the industry it regulates, while also adding confidence, trust and stability for consumers.”
At the time of publication, there were six comments posted on the act page, some of which offered a lone war cry (“Taxation is robbery”) and others which suggested questionable changes to the text.
Due to its “absolute scarcity” feature, a user by the name of Stduey argues that Bitcoin is unique and shouldn’t be included with dangerous “assets.”
Justifies a completely distinct bill for Bitcoin:
“If you buy 5,000 satoshis for $1, you will have 5,000/2.1 quadrillion satoshis, forever, and no one can change that. People cannot understand the magnitude of this yet but this subtle difference is what separates Bitcoin from every other crypto, fiat, precious metal, and commodity.”
The inconsistency of the present structure for airdrops is further explained by commenter savage1r, who points out that it relates the taxable value of coins to their entrance price, which may be much greater than during the cash-out phase:
“Airdrop receivers should only have to pay short or long term taxes on the coins they cash out assuming the initial value is $0 because they do not realize the gains until they trade or sell.”
On June 7, the eagerly anticipated RFIA was introduced in the US Senate. The community as a whole agrees that the measure is in favor of cryptocurrency.
DISCLAIMER: The Information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Join CoinCu Telegram to keep track of news: https://t.me/coincunews
Follow CoinCu Youtube Channel | Follow CoinCu Facebook page
Annie
CoinCu News
Other Posts
Related Posts
Latest
Why Qubetics, NEAR Protocol, and IMX Are Dominating Crypto: The Best Altcoins to Join Today for Game-Changing Returns
Bonk’s ICO Was Just the Start: Why BTFD Coin’s Stage 7 Price Rollback Is Your Second Shot at Crypto Glory
Decoding BDAG’s AMA: A Blueprint for Scalable Blockchain and Enhanced Community Ties
Press Release
Why Qubetics, NEAR Protocol, and IMX Are Dominating Crypto: The Best Altcoins to Join Today for Game-Changing Returns
Bonk’s ICO Was Just the Start: Why BTFD Coin’s Stage 7 Price Rollback Is Your Second Shot at Crypto Glory
