dYdX Analysis: Potential Solutions To Become A More Attractive Investment Opportunity
Perpetual contracts can be said to be the lifeblood of encrypted transactions. Perps accounted for two-thirds of transaction volume, while spot transactions accounted for only one-third. dYdX is the most popular decentralized exchange (DEX) for trading perps. With the release of dYdX v4, they will soon be moving to the Cosmos chain.
dYdX uses a central limit order book model rather than the popular one. Automated Market Maker (AMM) model, making it immediately familiar to even traditional traders who have never traded cryptocurrencies. It can be said that the dYdX model combines the security and transparency of a DEX with the speed and usability of a CEX.
Market structure
Founded in 2017, the protocol quickly won over users with its deep liquidity, a large number of trading pairs, and smooth user experience (UX). Today, dYdX continues to dominate in terms of trading volume and daily user count. The trading volume of dYdX accounts for more than 70% of the daily perpetual trading volume of all DEXs.
This transaction volume is converted into revenue through a maker-taker fee model. The maker-taker model is a way of distinguishing between order fees that add liquidity (“maker” orders or regular orders) or remove liquidity (“taker” orders or orders that execute immediately). Taker fees range from. 0.2% to 0.5%, while Maker fees range from. 0%-0.02%. Fees decrease as users trade more each month, but any trades below $100,000 are free.
dYdX has a lot of daily revenue but has always lagged behind competitor GMX, another perp protocol. GMX utilizes liquidity pools to trade with traders rather than dYdX’s order book model. This model has the advantage of lower slippage but usually results in lower liquidity. GMX is limited by the number of currency pairs it offers and has limits on the liquidity of specific currency pairs based on the risk of the pool.
GMX has a flat fee structure where traders pay 0.1% for initiating trades and 0.1% for closing trades. Additionally, due to the structure of the swap contract, a small hourly borrowing fee is incurred. Due to higher fees, GMX can often earn higher daily revenues despite trading volumes much lower than dYdX. dYdX and GMX together generate around 70% of all DEX revenues.
Spot trading provides GMX with an additional source of revenue. Fees range from 0.2% to over 0.5% and help the protocol add hundreds of thousands of dollars in profits every day. GMX has replaced the popular Curve platform, although it only offers to trade for a handful of assets.
While social media has focused on GMX over the past few months due to the recent rapid appreciation in the price of its native token, dYdX has recently returned to the spotlight, with much discussion surrounding the economic model of its native token, DYDX.
dYdX token economics
The DYDX token supply schedule has been a looming issue for the protocol since its inception. The upcoming token unlocks, scheduled for early February, has brought this issue back into the spotlight. dYdX was originally scheduled to unlock most of it for early investors on February 2nd.
Vested tokens will be primarily available to investors, contributors and advisors. The composition of unlocked tokens may have created some near-term selling pressure as many of these folks would have been sitting on huge gains – at least 2x.
As mentioned earlier, this distribution is particularly noteworthy since roughly only 23% of the token supply is in circulation. With the February unlock, the token supply almost doubled overnight.
However, dYdX recently announced that they will be delaying unlocking until December 2023. This move gave the team time to consider further distribution options that would not result in a flood of new tokens flooding the market.
Concerns about DYDX go beyond the vesting schedule, including that the income currently earned will go to the private entity dYdX Trading Inc., rather than the agreement or token holders, and the relatively small demand for tokens that will be in circulation.
Potential solution
The adjusted vesting schedule merely postpones the inevitable and does not address the broader underlying problems facing the agreement. Increasing the attractiveness of tokens to investors is critical as most of the token supply has not yet been released. Why should the protocol care about token value?
As dYdX migrates to its own Cosmos chain, the token value becomes an integral part of network security. DYDX market cap becomes part of the cost of attacking the network.
dYdX has taken the first and most meaningful step towards improving token economics, announcing that it will redirect accrued revenue to validators and stakers instead of dYdX Trading Inc. It’s a fantastic first step, but it could be moved forward with some potential solutions that should further increase its appeal to potential token holders and proponents of decentralization.
Adjust the fee structure
Trading on dYdX is already about 5 times cheaper than trading on GMX and about 4 times cheaper than Gains Network and MUX. Even doubling the fees would still leave a huge gap for new revenue. The existing maker-taker fee structure makes implementing fee adjustments between existing tiers simple.
Taker fees may increase just to further incentivize deep liquidity. dYdX has a better depth of trading pairs than its competitors and already has a group of large market makers on the platform. Increased liquidity will continue to attract institutional-level trading rather than retail investors.
Still, dYdX is not competing with other DEXs in a vacuum. CEXs such as Binance are the biggest competitors. Today, dYdX and Binance have essentially the same fees. Adding fees would make it less competitive with Binance, but there are reasons to allow some decentralization premium here. GMX proves this point, although the fee is orders of magnitude higher, users are still using it. A slight increase in fees is unlikely to drive users toward CEX.
Increase transparency
The dYdX team should improve communication about protocol development, especially how funds are allocated. It’s not clear what dYdX Trading Inc. is doing with the nearly $400 million it has amassed since its founding. Token holders will benefit from having a clear understanding of how to allocate this capital to grow the business. Transparency in the use of funds will help improve investor sentiment.
Expand the scope of services
GMX has proven that spot trading is popular with users, and it would be convenient to have this functionality built into the platform. GMX spot trading is not the cheapest, but it is easy for traders to use. On average, GMX earns around $200,000 per day just from the spot.
Metamask also demonstrates this use case, making millions of dollars per day through token conversions despite being much more expensive than competing options. Outsourcing this to an aggregator while charging volume fees is another option, especially for users concerned about slippage.
Changes to the token unlock schedule
Teams can adjust to gradually unlocking tokens on a monthly or even daily basis, eliminating the need for a lot of upcoming unlocks. There is no reason to have a lot of new liquidity flooding the market in one day. Investors can unlock their amount within 180 or 365 days. The challenge will be a coordination issue – off-chain legal agreements must be changed. The recent vesting cliff changes show that this can be done.
Create a new demand pool
Regardless, a massive token supply is coming. To mitigate this, new demand pools for DYDX should be considered first. Staking will be the main point, but there are still other avenues. Due to the higher fee level, there is room for increased discounts for DYDX holders. This is the most direct path to continue incentivizing liquidity while reducing DYDX token velocity.
Conclusion
dYdX is a top-notch platform, but a series of issues with the associated tokens have made investor addition slower than it should have been. By adopting the proposed solution, DYDX will become an even more attractive investment, increasing the security of new networks. The good news is that the hard part is done: dYdX is the most popular DEX. Now is the time to unlock the value that the underlying protocols offer token holders.
DISCLAIMER: The Information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Join us to keep track of news: https://linktr.ee/coincu
Website: coincu.com
Harold
Coincu News
Author
Knowledge
dYdX Analysis: Potential Solutions To Become A More Attractive Investment Opportunity
Perpetual contracts can be said to be the lifeblood of encrypted transactions. Perps accounted for two-thirds of transaction volume, while spot transactions accounted for only one-third. dYdX is the most popular decentralized exchange (DEX) for trading perps. With the release of dYdX v4, they will soon be moving to the Cosmos chain.
dYdX uses a central limit order book model rather than the popular one. Automated Market Maker (AMM) model, making it immediately familiar to even traditional traders who have never traded cryptocurrencies. It can be said that the dYdX model combines the security and transparency of a DEX with the speed and usability of a CEX.
Market structure
Founded in 2017, the protocol quickly won over users with its deep liquidity, a large number of trading pairs, and smooth user experience (UX). Today, dYdX continues to dominate in terms of trading volume and daily user count. The trading volume of dYdX accounts for more than 70% of the daily perpetual trading volume of all DEXs.
This transaction volume is converted into revenue through a maker-taker fee model. The maker-taker model is a way of distinguishing between order fees that add liquidity (“maker” orders or regular orders) or remove liquidity (“taker” orders or orders that execute immediately). Taker fees range from. 0.2% to 0.5%, while Maker fees range from. 0%-0.02%. Fees decrease as users trade more each month, but any trades below $100,000 are free.
dYdX has a lot of daily revenue but has always lagged behind competitor GMX, another perp protocol. GMX utilizes liquidity pools to trade with traders rather than dYdX’s order book model. This model has the advantage of lower slippage but usually results in lower liquidity. GMX is limited by the number of currency pairs it offers and has limits on the liquidity of specific currency pairs based on the risk of the pool.
GMX has a flat fee structure where traders pay 0.1% for initiating trades and 0.1% for closing trades. Additionally, due to the structure of the swap contract, a small hourly borrowing fee is incurred. Due to higher fees, GMX can often earn higher daily revenues despite trading volumes much lower than dYdX. dYdX and GMX together generate around 70% of all DEX revenues.
Spot trading provides GMX with an additional source of revenue. Fees range from 0.2% to over 0.5% and help the protocol add hundreds of thousands of dollars in profits every day. GMX has replaced the popular Curve platform, although it only offers to trade for a handful of assets.
While social media has focused on GMX over the past few months due to the recent rapid appreciation in the price of its native token, dYdX has recently returned to the spotlight, with much discussion surrounding the economic model of its native token, DYDX.
dYdX token economics
The DYDX token supply schedule has been a looming issue for the protocol since its inception. The upcoming token unlocks, scheduled for early February, has brought this issue back into the spotlight. dYdX was originally scheduled to unlock most of it for early investors on February 2nd.
Vested tokens will be primarily available to investors, contributors and advisors. The composition of unlocked tokens may have created some near-term selling pressure as many of these folks would have been sitting on huge gains – at least 2x.
As mentioned earlier, this distribution is particularly noteworthy since roughly only 23% of the token supply is in circulation. With the February unlock, the token supply almost doubled overnight.
However, dYdX recently announced that they will be delaying unlocking until December 2023. This move gave the team time to consider further distribution options that would not result in a flood of new tokens flooding the market.
Concerns about DYDX go beyond the vesting schedule, including that the income currently earned will go to the private entity dYdX Trading Inc., rather than the agreement or token holders, and the relatively small demand for tokens that will be in circulation.
Potential solution
The adjusted vesting schedule merely postpones the inevitable and does not address the broader underlying problems facing the agreement. Increasing the attractiveness of tokens to investors is critical as most of the token supply has not yet been released. Why should the protocol care about token value?
As dYdX migrates to its own Cosmos chain, the token value becomes an integral part of network security. DYDX market cap becomes part of the cost of attacking the network.
dYdX has taken the first and most meaningful step towards improving token economics, announcing that it will redirect accrued revenue to validators and stakers instead of dYdX Trading Inc. It’s a fantastic first step, but it could be moved forward with some potential solutions that should further increase its appeal to potential token holders and proponents of decentralization.
Adjust the fee structure
Trading on dYdX is already about 5 times cheaper than trading on GMX and about 4 times cheaper than Gains Network and MUX. Even doubling the fees would still leave a huge gap for new revenue. The existing maker-taker fee structure makes implementing fee adjustments between existing tiers simple.
Taker fees may increase just to further incentivize deep liquidity. dYdX has a better depth of trading pairs than its competitors and already has a group of large market makers on the platform. Increased liquidity will continue to attract institutional-level trading rather than retail investors.
Still, dYdX is not competing with other DEXs in a vacuum. CEXs such as Binance are the biggest competitors. Today, dYdX and Binance have essentially the same fees. Adding fees would make it less competitive with Binance, but there are reasons to allow some decentralization premium here. GMX proves this point, although the fee is orders of magnitude higher, users are still using it. A slight increase in fees is unlikely to drive users toward CEX.
Increase transparency
The dYdX team should improve communication about protocol development, especially how funds are allocated. It’s not clear what dYdX Trading Inc. is doing with the nearly $400 million it has amassed since its founding. Token holders will benefit from having a clear understanding of how to allocate this capital to grow the business. Transparency in the use of funds will help improve investor sentiment.
Expand the scope of services
GMX has proven that spot trading is popular with users, and it would be convenient to have this functionality built into the platform. GMX spot trading is not the cheapest, but it is easy for traders to use. On average, GMX earns around $200,000 per day just from the spot.
Metamask also demonstrates this use case, making millions of dollars per day through token conversions despite being much more expensive than competing options. Outsourcing this to an aggregator while charging volume fees is another option, especially for users concerned about slippage.
Changes to the token unlock schedule
Teams can adjust to gradually unlocking tokens on a monthly or even daily basis, eliminating the need for a lot of upcoming unlocks. There is no reason to have a lot of new liquidity flooding the market in one day. Investors can unlock their amount within 180 or 365 days. The challenge will be a coordination issue – off-chain legal agreements must be changed. The recent vesting cliff changes show that this can be done.
Create a new demand pool
Regardless, a massive token supply is coming. To mitigate this, new demand pools for DYDX should be considered first. Staking will be the main point, but there are still other avenues. Due to the higher fee level, there is room for increased discounts for DYDX holders. This is the most direct path to continue incentivizing liquidity while reducing DYDX token velocity.
Conclusion
dYdX is a top-notch platform, but a series of issues with the associated tokens have made investor addition slower than it should have been. By adopting the proposed solution, DYDX will become an even more attractive investment, increasing the security of new networks. The good news is that the hard part is done: dYdX is the most popular DEX. Now is the time to unlock the value that the underlying protocols offer token holders.
DISCLAIMER: The Information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Join us to keep track of news: https://linktr.ee/coincu
Website: coincu.com
Harold
Coincu News
Other Posts
Related Posts
Latest
Decoding BDAG’s AMA: A Blueprint for Scalable Blockchain and Enhanced Community Ties
Best Cryptos with 1000X Potential: Qubetics Revolutionises Blockchain as Polkadot and Cosmos Shape the Future
Best Coins to Buy in December 2024: Qubetics Offer 630% ROI, Polkadot Delivers on Interoperability and Near Protocol’s Scalability is Talk of the Town
Press Release
Decoding BDAG’s AMA: A Blueprint for Scalable Blockchain and Enhanced Community Ties
Best Cryptos with 1000X Potential: Qubetics Revolutionises Blockchain as Polkadot and Cosmos Shape the Future
