New Hampshire Court Stand With The SEC In Battle With LBRY Platform
In a judicial dispute with the decentralized publishing platform LBRY, the Securities and Exchange Commission won by asserting that its token was under regulatory control.
In its ruling, the New Hampshire District Court stated that LBRY is wrong regarding the law and the facts. The SEC’s move for summary judgment was granted by Judge Paul Barbadoro, putting an end to a case that started in March.
Even though the initiative did not sell the LBC token through an initial coin offering (ICO), the court determined that it constituted an investment contract. The decentralizing publication was a declared goal of the project when it started in 2016.
“In summary, what the evidence in the record discloses is that LBRY promoted LBC as an investment that would grow in value over time through the company’s development of the LBRY Network.
While some unknown number of purchasers may have acquired LBC in part for consumptive purposes, this does not change the fact that the objective economic realities of LBRY’s offerings of LBC establish that it was offering it as a security. B. Did LBRY Receive Fair Notice?”
The judgment is a big setback for cryptocurrency issuers, many of whom have claimed that the SEC is using a regulation-by-enforcement approach. Similar to LBRY, many proponents of token issuance contend that the commission has not adequately informed the crypto industry of how it would exercise its authority.
DISCLAIMER: The Information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Join us to keep track of news: https://linktr.ee/coincu
Website: coincu.com
Harold
CoinCu News
Author
News
New Hampshire Court Stand With The SEC In Battle With LBRY Platform
In a judicial dispute with the decentralized publishing platform LBRY, the Securities and Exchange Commission won by asserting that its token was under regulatory control.
In its ruling, the New Hampshire District Court stated that LBRY is wrong regarding the law and the facts. The SEC’s move for summary judgment was granted by Judge Paul Barbadoro, putting an end to a case that started in March.
Even though the initiative did not sell the LBC token through an initial coin offering (ICO), the court determined that it constituted an investment contract. The decentralizing publication was a declared goal of the project when it started in 2016.
“In summary, what the evidence in the record discloses is that LBRY promoted LBC as an investment that would grow in value over time through the company’s development of the LBRY Network.
While some unknown number of purchasers may have acquired LBC in part for consumptive purposes, this does not change the fact that the objective economic realities of LBRY’s offerings of LBC establish that it was offering it as a security. B. Did LBRY Receive Fair Notice?”
The judgment is a big setback for cryptocurrency issuers, many of whom have claimed that the SEC is using a regulation-by-enforcement approach. Similar to LBRY, many proponents of token issuance contend that the commission has not adequately informed the crypto industry of how it would exercise its authority.
DISCLAIMER: The Information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Join us to keep track of news: https://linktr.ee/coincu
Website: coincu.com
Harold
CoinCu News
Other Posts
Related Posts
Latest
Pepeto’s $600K Presale Highlights Vision for Supporting Memecoins Ahead of 2025
Best Cryptos to Buy in November 2024: What Sets Qubetics Apart from Fantom and Immutable X?
Press Release
Pepeto’s $600K Presale Highlights Vision for Supporting Memecoins Ahead of 2025
Best Cryptos to Buy in November 2024: What Sets Qubetics Apart from Fantom and Immutable X?
