Vitalik: Ethereum Consensus Overload Will Bring High Risk To Ecosystem
Key Points:
- Vitalik pointed out that the ultimate oracle technologies, L1-directed Reset and Recovery of L2 project technologies, etc., will bring high systemic risk to the ecosystem.
- The article points out that we should be wary of application layer projects that take actions that risk increasing the “Scope” of the blockchain consensus.
- According to Vitalik, what we should do is verify the core Ethereum protocol rules and should maintain the minimalism of the chain.
Vitalik Buterin, Co-Founder of Ethereum, published an article, “Don’t Overload Ethereum’s Consensus” and argued that the ultimate oracle technologies, Stake Reset, and L1-driven recovery of the technologies L2 projects, etc., will bring high systemic risk to the ecosystem.
The Ethereum founder said in the article that over the years, developers/projects have had many ideas to use Ethereum’s consensus for other purposes (usually in the beta phase), such as the last prophecy, recommit, and resurrecting L2 projects based on L1.
The purpose of this post will be to explain in detail the argument why a specific subset of these techniques brings high systemic risks to the ecosystem and should be discouraged and resisted.
The report concludes that the social consensus of the blockchain community is fragile and should be used with caution in mature communities. Some developers try to extend the core of the blockchain with more and more functionality, but each such extension makes the core more vulnerable. We should be wary of actions taken by application layer projects that could increase the “scope” of blockchain consensus rather than validate Ethereum’s core protocol rules.
Such an idea is often conceived without considering the risks, but its results can easily contradict the goals of the entire community. Such a process has no limiting principle and could easily lead to a blockchain community having more and more “mandates” over time, pushing it into an uncomfortable choice between a high yearly risk of splitting and some kind of de-facto formalized bureaucracy that has ultimate control of the chain.
Instead, we should maintain chain minimalism and help developers find alternative strategies to achieve their security goals.
DISCLAIMER: The Information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Join us to keep track of news: https://linktr.ee/coincu
Foxy
Coincu News
Author
Ethereum
Vitalik: Ethereum Consensus Overload Will Bring High Risk To Ecosystem
Key Points:
- Vitalik pointed out that the ultimate oracle technologies, L1-directed Reset and Recovery of L2 project technologies, etc., will bring high systemic risk to the ecosystem.
- The article points out that we should be wary of application layer projects that take actions that risk increasing the “Scope” of the blockchain consensus.
- According to Vitalik, what we should do is verify the core Ethereum protocol rules and should maintain the minimalism of the chain.
Vitalik Buterin, Co-Founder of Ethereum, published an article, “Don’t Overload Ethereum’s Consensus” and argued that the ultimate oracle technologies, Stake Reset, and L1-driven recovery of the technologies L2 projects, etc., will bring high systemic risk to the ecosystem.
The Ethereum founder said in the article that over the years, developers/projects have had many ideas to use Ethereum’s consensus for other purposes (usually in the beta phase), such as the last prophecy, recommit, and resurrecting L2 projects based on L1.
The purpose of this post will be to explain in detail the argument why a specific subset of these techniques brings high systemic risks to the ecosystem and should be discouraged and resisted.
The report concludes that the social consensus of the blockchain community is fragile and should be used with caution in mature communities. Some developers try to extend the core of the blockchain with more and more functionality, but each such extension makes the core more vulnerable. We should be wary of actions taken by application layer projects that could increase the “scope” of blockchain consensus rather than validate Ethereum’s core protocol rules.
Such an idea is often conceived without considering the risks, but its results can easily contradict the goals of the entire community. Such a process has no limiting principle and could easily lead to a blockchain community having more and more “mandates” over time, pushing it into an uncomfortable choice between a high yearly risk of splitting and some kind of de-facto formalized bureaucracy that has ultimate control of the chain.
Instead, we should maintain chain minimalism and help developers find alternative strategies to achieve their security goals.
DISCLAIMER: The Information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Join us to keep track of news: https://linktr.ee/coincu
Foxy
Coincu News
Other Posts
Related Posts
News
